Compared to the two competitors, the benefits of Spin only one, at most, capacity 125 cc. Others are indifferent. Forms are also more inclined to Mio. With a capacity of only 110 cc matik already feels extravagant when compared to duck, what if the 125 cc? This weakness can be at once profitable Spin. for maniak speed, it will choose Spin which has the largest capacity.
Plus points in the service of Suzuki, three-year free service and oil change. This is very beneficial in this difficult period. Not a matter of service and warranty, the most you a Suzuki from the first. Once so brave and pioneering among the other competitors. So if consumers buy Spin, do not have a headache thinking about service. Moreover, engine technology still Step eleven twelve with SHOGUN 125 series / Arashi like Mio series with Vega / Jupiter series. Not use the radiator. Simple.
Plus points in the service of Suzuki, three-year free service and oil change. This is very beneficial in this difficult period. Not a matter of service and warranty, the most you a Suzuki from the first. Once so brave and pioneering among the other competitors. So if consumers buy Spin, do not have a headache thinking about service. Moreover, engine technology still Step eleven twelve with SHOGUN 125 series / Arashi like Mio series with Vega / Jupiter series. Not use the radiator. Simple.
(comparison test consumption bbm kymco free lx, mio, vario, the same spin)
results:
- Mio most extravagant
- Vario far more economical from the mio
- Spin out of more unstinted vario but more economical from the mio
- Free lx, bgt bizarre, depending makenya, free lx can be more economical from the vario, but can also more wasteful of spin
- Vario cc is less than the mio, its spin-cc more than the mio, but 2 2 its more economical from the mio
- Mio, vario, spin: pas jammed more economical from the demon
- Free of the lx, drag more economical than fitting jammed